It is ‘assumed’ we are more aggressive drivers, henceforth more dangerous and a risk. This is a broad generalizaion as not all men are aggressive drivers.

Women aren’t happy that it is ‘assumed’ men are better woker than women, henceforth men get paid more. Again this is a generalization as women can be good workers.

Wha do you think?
Another flaw for the feminist movement.
Read the details please. I said it is ‘assumed’ we are more aggressive drivers and henceforce more prone to having accidents. But on the other side, women are ‘assumed’ to be less effective workers, therefore get paid less.
Jellybean you say a man can take public transportation. Public transportation is nowhere near as conveniant as owning a vehicle. You say women have to pay for the kid if the dad doesn’t pay child support. Well she should have know what she was getting into. You also say they need to buy makeup and whatnot, this is clearly not needed. A lot of women don’t even use makeup.
Jellybean you say women have to pay for clothes and hair products. So you think men don’t need to buy clothes? Or don’t need to wash their hair?
Sigh… Baba Yaga… I didn’t want to do this but… It is not ‘assumed’ men are better working than women because they are. Men are physically stronger in all aspects and are smarter than women by 5 IQ points. They also take less time off than women (periods, etc) which makes for more work done. Men are usually harder-working than women. Studies prove this.